On December 5, 2011 the New Jersey Assembly approved the passage of the New Jersey Trade Secrets Act. Governor Christie is expected to sign the bill, which will make New Jerseythe 47th state to adopt some version of the Uniform Trade Secrets Act. The Act largely codifies existing case law inNew Jersey. It is effective immediately but does not apply to misappropriations of trade secrets that pre-date the effective date, even in the case of misappropriations that continue after the effective date.
A trade secret is defined in the Act as:
[I]nformation, held by one or more people, without regard to form, including a formula, pattern, business data compilation, program, device, method, technique, design, diagram, drawing, invention, plan, procedure, prototype or process, that:
(1) Derives independent economic value, actual or potential, from not being generally known to, and not being readily ascertainable by proper means by, other persons who can obtain economic value from its disclosure or use; and
(2) Is the subject of efforts that are reasonable under the circumstances to maintain its secrecy.
The Act authorizes the recovery of damages for misappropriation of trade secrets, measured by both actual loss and unjust enrichment, as well as injunctive relief.
A court may award attorney’s fees and the costs of expert witnesses to the prevailing party in a misappropriation case if
a. willful and malicious misappropriation exists;
b. a claim of misappropriation is made in bad faith; or
c. a motion to terminate an injunction is made or resisted in bad faith. Bad faith is that which is undertaken or continued solely to harass or maliciously injure another, or to delay or prolong the resolution of the litigation, or that which is without any reasonable basis in fact or law and not capable of support by a good faith argument for an extension, modification or reversal of existing law.
As originally proposed, the legislation created a presumption in favor of granting protective orders in trade secret litigation. As adopted, however, the Act authorizes the court to presume the secrecy of an alleged trade secret in a manner consistent with the New Jersey Court Rules.
The Act establishes a three-year statute of limitations that begins to run when the misappropriation was discovered or should have been discovered, using “reasonable diligence.” The rights created under the Act are in addition to, rather than in abrogation of, other common law and statutory rights.
In response to the Act, businesses should continue to maintain a strong trade secrets policy, to limit access to such secrets to individuals with a need to know, to require strict non-disclosure agreements and to monitor and pursue potential misappropriations vigilantly.
W. Raymond Felton is the Chair of the Corporate Department and Co-Managing Partner of the firm. He was selected as Best Lawyers “Mergers & Acquisitions Law Lawyer of the Year -Woodbridge”, 2012. Mr. Felton’s practice focuses in the areas of corporate, LLC and securities law with an emphasis on mergers & acquisitions and financing transactions through both the public andprivate equity and debt markets. He represents start-up and emerging companies in many industries including high-tech, as well as a number of mature and established companies.
About Greenbaum
Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis LLP has over 100 attorneys in four main practice departments, Litigation, Real Estate, Corporate, and Tax, Trusts and Estates, and 19 practice areas offering comprehensive legal services. The firm has offices located in Woodbridge and Roseland, New Jersey. For more information, visit the firm’s web site at http://www.greenbaumlaw.com
Tags: corporate lawyers, litigation attorneys, new jersey business lawyers, uniform trade secrets act
About Zamorano University
